/
Questions/
assignment/
Applied Research in Organizational Behaviour and Leadership Assignment : Doctorate in Management - UCAM Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia
Looking For Plagiarism Free Answers For Your UAE College/ University Assignments.
BUY NOWApplied Research in Organizational Behaviour and Leadership Assignment : Doctorate in Management - UCAM Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia
| University | Other |
|---|---|
| Subject | Applied Research in Organizational Behaviour and Leadership |
APPLIED RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOUR AND LEADERSHIP |
|
|
COURSE/ UNIT INFORMATION |
|
|
Course |
Doctorate in Management - UCAM |
|
Course Level |
Doctoral |
|
Module Name |
Applied Research in Organizational Behaviour and Leadership (AROBL) |
ASSSESSMENT FFEDBACK |
||
|
TO BE FILLED BY THE ASSESSOR |
||
|
NB: The Turnitin will be checked internally by assessors only. |
||
|
Assessment type |
Marks |
Marks Awarded |
|
Task 1: Individual Presentation |
40 |
|
|
Task 2: Critical Essay |
60 |
|
|
Overall Marks |
100 |
|
|
Overall Grade achieved by the learner |
|
|
|
Summative Feedback by Assessor for further improvement |
||
GRADE DESCRIPTORS
|
70% and above (Distinction) |
The assignment evaluated is of a high to exemplary standard. The work addresses clearly and articulates the assignment requirements and thus meets and satisfies all the learning outcomes (either well or in an exemplary way). The work demonstrates: clear knowledge; references to appropriate academic literature; analysis; critical evaluation; and originality of argument. It is structured and presented to a high (or exemplary) standard. Referencing conventions are fully observed. |
|
60 to 69% (Merit) |
The assignment evaluated is of a good to a high standard. Substantial knowledge, comprehension and analysis are evident throughout. Arguments presented are clear and focused with a logical structure in place. There is clear evidence of critical evaluation of a wide range of theories/perspectives from academic literature and some independent thought. The work is well written and addresses well all of the learning outcomes. Referencing conventions are fully observed. |
|
50 to 59% (Pass) |
The assignment evaluated is of a fair to good standard. Adequate knowledge, comprehension and analysis are evident throughout. The arguments presented have a logical structure and show some critical evaluation in places, although there may be limited evidence of an independent perspective. There is evidence of some good engagement with some appropriate literature. Learning outcomes have been largely met and to an appropriate degree. Referencing conventions are observed. |
|
40 to 49% (Fail/Redo) |
The assignment evaluated is of a basic standard. The arguments presented have some logical structure and are supported by academic literature in most cases. The academic literature used is outside of the suggestions made in the module guide but remains limited. Little critical evaluation is evident, and the work tends more widely towards a descriptive style. Learning outcomes have been addressed in a basic but satisfactory way. Referencing conventions are mostly observed. |
|
Fail Grades |
|
|
30 to 39% (Module retake) |
The assignment evaluated is of a limited standard. Limited use of academic literature and as such knowledge and argument is very weak. A simple descriptive style with no evidence of critical evaluation throughout. Over-reliance on simplistic, limited sources. Referencing conventions may not be observed. Some learning outcomes met but in a weak and simplistic way. The work needs to be developed in greater depth and detail to move to a passable standard at this level of study |
|
29% and Below (Module retake) |
The assignment evaluated is of an unacceptable standard. There is little or no evidence of knowledge and understanding that is required at this level. Referencing is inadequate or non-existent. The learning outcomes have not been addressed fully, and the work requires significant modification to bring it to a passable standard. |
Module Description
The course will equip participants with the essential skills, strategies, and tools they need to unlock their fullest potential in taking up expanded leadership responsibilities to guide their organizations effectively. Participants will be exposed to fundamental elements and models of organizational behavior as well as research methods applied in studying Organizational Psychology. Participants will also be involved in a comparative analysis of effective leadership approaches and methodological considerations in Leadership research. These knowledge and skills will enable participants to build their capacities in integrative thinking, managing diversity, team building and managing effective teams, and negotiating and influencing skills which are essential skills in leading organizations in the global business environment.
Learning outcomes
LO1: To understand the fundamental elements and models of Organizational Behavior and influence of individual factors in organizational behavior.
LO2: To analyze effective leadership approaches and their application in leading successful Organizations
LO3: Discuss methodological approaches used in Leadership research.
LO4: To analyze and conceptualize Quantitative and qualitative research methods used in organizational Psychology.
Expectations
1. Materials Access
All learning materials are provided in the form of a module kit and can be accessed from the Learning Management system (LMS)
2. Learning Hours
Students need to be aware of their commitment requirements regarding study time. To give you an indication of that, we have based the following information on the United Kingdom (UK) Higher Education Quality Assurance Agency guidelines. “The notional learning hours associated with qualifications, programs and individual units of study are based on a broad agreement across institutions that students can expect to spend 10 hours learning on average in order to gain one academic credit unit” (QAA 2006).
3. Re-sit
If you do not secure a pass, please read closely the feedback and speak with your Course leader(s) or faculty. After consulting the feedback, close attention is essential to rework on the areas of weakness and then resubmit the work at the next opportunity. As per the QAA requirements, only one REDO is allowed where the marks will be capped at a Pass.
4. Plagiarism
All forms of plagiarism are taken seriously, and any suspected cases will be investigated thoroughly. If a case is found proven, then the work will be graded as a fail and the case will be reviewed by the academic committee. The assessment team checks the Turnitin before the evaluation of the assignment is undertaken.
5. Student appeals
There are no re-evaluations as the marks are graded and internally verified before release. However, as per our appeals policy, a student can make an appeal to the course leader which will be then reviewed by the academic committee (please check our academic policies and procedures manual for more information)
6. Assignment submission extensions
Students can apply for extensions via the LMS based on extenuating circumstances (if any) with evidence (proof) as per our extensions policy.
General Guidelines
- Complete the ‘To be filled by the student section’ in the cover page.
- All assignments must be submitted as an electronic document in MS word via the LMS (Use 12 Times New Roman script with 1.5 spacing between lines)
- The results are declared only if the student has met the mandatory attendance requirement of 75% and/or minimum 50 % under extenuating circumstances approved and ratified by the academic committee and the examination board.
- The assignment should not contain any content with references cited from websites such as ukessays.com, styudymode.com, slideshare.net, scribd.com, Wikipedia but should contain references/citations from credible academic journal and articles.
- Submit the assignment in MS word document with the file name being:
First Name Last Name _ Module Code
Example: John Smith_GM701
Checklist
|
o |
I have filled the student Information on the cover sheet as given in the start of the document. |
|
o |
The contents of the assignment are purely my own work, and I give the assessors a right to run it through any plagiarism check. |
|
o |
I have strictly followed Harvard Referencing Style and Citations. |
|
o |
I acknowledge and adhere to the institution's AI Policy Statement, ensuring the ethical and responsible use of AI tools, and confirm that all my submissions will reflect originality and integrity. |
|
o |
I declare that all websites and AI tools utilized during the preparation of this assignment comply with the AI Policy. |
Assessment Tasks
Organizations across industries face challenges related to workforce dynamics and leadership effectiveness. To address these challenges, it is essential to explore the application of leadership theories, organizational behavior models, and methodological approaches to research in organizational psychology. There are two tasks; you are expected to answer all questions of both the tasks. Task 1 is a Presentation of 12 slides. For task 2, you will have to prepare a Critical Essay of 2500 words.
NOTE: All claims and arguments must be substantiated using a minimum of 25 high-quality academic references, including peer-reviewed journal articles, scholarly books, and reputable research publications. Non-academic sources such as commercial websites, blogs, or Wikipedia are not considered appropriate for doctoral-level references.
Task1: Presentation on OB and Leadership for a chosen organization (Minimum 10 Slides and Maximum 12 slides, 40 Marks)
- Choose a company and a region where the company is operating as the focus for Task 1.
Provide an overview of fundamental Organizational Behavior (OB) models and Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions for the chosen company in the chosen region. Analyze how individual factors influence organizational behavior within your chosen company. Recommend strategies to improve employee engagement and performance while fostering a positive organizational culture. [6 Slides, 20 Marks]
- Compare and contrast at least two leadership styles in the context of addressing challenges faced by your chosen organization. Critically evaluate the relevance of these theories in solving a specific organizational issue in the chosen company. Propose a leadership framework suitable for your chosen company, focusing on improving team alignment, motivation, and performance. [6 Slides, 20 Marks]
Task 2: Critical Essay (Minimum 2400 words and Maximum 2500 words, 60 Marks)
- Do comparative analysis of the use of quantitative and qualitative research methods in organizational psychology and leadership. Focus on topics such as workplace motivation, employee well-being, or leadership effectiveness. [700 words, 20 marks].
- Discuss the use of mixed methods in research on leadership and organizational psychology. Focus on topics like leaders’ role in the organization development or organization growth etc. [600 words, 10 marks].
- Do an extensive review of at least 10 articles related to leadership research and critically analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the methodology used by the authors. Justify the method that best suits different topics of leadership research according to your understanding. [1200 words, 30 marks].
START WRITING YOUR ANSWERS FROM THE NEXT PAGE
Get help by expert
Struggling with your Applied Research in Organizational Behaviour and Leadership (AROBL) assignment for your UCAM Doctorate in Management? At UAE Assignment Help, our PhD experts deliver 100% plagiarism-free essay and presentations that meet UCAM’s academic standards. Get expert guidance on leadership theories, OB models, and research methods to craft a high-quality submission. Order now to secure top grades with human-written, original content!
Recent solved questions
- Principles of Microeconomics Assignment | UAE University
- CIPD 5HR02 Talent Management and Workforce Planning Group Assignment Written Brief
- CIPD 5HR01 Employment Relationship Management Group Assessment September 2024
- CIPD 3CO04 Essentials of People Practice Learner Assessment Brief Case Study June 2025
- CIPD 5CO03 Professional Behaviours and Valuing People Learner Assessment Brief June 2025
- CIPD 5CO02 Evidence Based Practice Level 5 Associate Diploma Learner Assessment Brief June 2025
- CIPD 5CO01 Organisational performance and culture in practice Level 5 Diploma Learner Assessment Brief June 2025
- Discrete Mathematics Assignment : United Arab Emirates University
- INS699 Master of Science in Information Systems Management Research Thesis | Zayed University UAE
- International Marketing Management IIM Assignment Report 2025-26 | Keynoverse Institute Dubai

